You are reading content from Scuttlebutt
@mix.exe %OJHTV21C6PWspEHoTinGGQHI2Kay55SUDQjGVG40MzE=.sha256
Re: %DAH56hRDC

Y'all spell-casting is hard work, and dangerous.

I think I like Robin Hobb's idea of a "coterie" - a group who work closely to cast spells together. When I post a proposal, I've often discussed it out-of-band with a couple of butts or non-butts. This means the first presentation is often tempered and honed with their input. I'm not sure, but suspect @elavoie might be running a different model (keen to hear) which is putting his own first thinking up on scuttlebutt to clarify.

I'm reflecting on this thread and the dynamics between people here.

I think I'm sensing a bit of "jumping to a conclusion"... as in Elavoie has done some analysis (which he's shared) and then synthesised a possible path forward. The "jumping to the conclusion" bit is that I think perhaps people need to go through the analysis themselves, or with elavoie, otherwise we have bits of analysis popping up later while it looks like we're discussing synthesis. Maybe this can't be avoided. It's hard because proposing a solution definitely provokes reaction/ engagement, whereas organising a working group to analyse future pathways to grow scuttlebutt and it's people requires a lot more groundwork (I'm really keen on participating in something like that btw).
This is a pattern that's referenced in "Theory U" - you cannot shortcut the journey.

Keen to hear if this is a useful sensing or is an misplaced sense I have.
If it's useful, I think the proposal is is anyone interested in backing up and casting a larger spell as a coterie?

User has not chosen to be hosted publicly
User has not chosen to be hosted publicly
User has not chosen to be hosted publicly
User has not chosen to be hosted publicly
User has not chosen to be hosted publicly
User has not chosen to be hosted publicly
Join Scuttlebutt now