You are reading content from Scuttlebutt
@Dominic %9cmtmRKSORrBj8CHFumcneCl4uJecOSrxmGXsYdl5xk=.sha256
Re: %QOTRH1C4E

@aljoscha as I've expressed else where, the idea of implementing optional timestamps doesn't actually excite me. It doesn't lead to new capabilities, or make ssb compelling for new use cases. Of all the things we could be working on, I think there are much more interesting priorities. If this was a thing that more people (especially application developers) where requesting, that might be different.

Join Scuttlebutt now