You are reading content from Scuttlebutt
@ev %FiWmd8R2kJp8a12GWemQSANpwqKCOb/yngb+JEcbJU4=.sha256
Re: %GQyu9Sz1+

@Aljoscha I agree with @matt here -- it'd make the most sense for timestamp-less messages to be a different message type than type: "post".

I'm having trouble imagining how these timestamp-less messages will be used, would you be up for describing your application idea?

Join Scuttlebutt now