You are reading content from Scuttlebutt
@aljoscha %LDtyPsdzt0QMFXL9fPRhBNzMF8rqGmLaUc196cjluu4=.sha256
Re: %iy6Pekirb

@Dominic

@aljoscha I think it would be more elegant to just drop the enforcement of the type field, if there was really a need for messages with absolutely minimal overhead.

But why? What is more elegant about forcing somebody who wants to send a single value to wrap it in a completely useless map? Why not do fully general solution that also moves the type where it belongs - into the metadata?

Additionally, optional "type" would be a breaking change.

Join Scuttlebutt now