Agreed, I feel like I alluded to my opinion in the first post was to keep change slow and incremental given the highly emotional nature of the experiment and the different angles people will be coming at it from. Looking back it appears I missed that off my post, my mind was jumbled up with many thoughts that day.

Regardless, the can of worms I alluded to in my previous post that may emerge at the other end of this is worth noticing. Especially since the second part of the experiment is patching on a tool to use alongside the multisig, I think our choice of tool will be tied into this. While the experiment can remain simple, its direction will emerge through more broad and challenging conversations.

And I'm in whole hearted agreement with Peg (and @mix and @Dan Hassan's sentiment) on emphasising the emotions that arise when having this conversation, much of the both positive and negative emotions that Peg mentioned also were raised for me, learning how to set your own workload, knowing where to draw a line, how to value your own skills and work, and thinking/worrying about how others value your work. I feel like much of that came across in my last post, perhaps it was the subtext.