You are reading content from Scuttlebutt
@andrestaltz %nJPOHqo4GVnC0PqLPfK6+pDnO3QebxoEdRECQkMkQIs=.sha256
Re: %FOyO23xiO

Okay, I get it now and I agree -1 doesn't make sense for the weights.

Friend distance could also make sense for prioritizing replication, right? E.g. "sync with friends at distance 1 first with maximum possible bandwidth, then sync with friends at distance 2 with throttled bandwidth" sort of like Torrent leeching prioritization. cc @Piet

Join Scuttlebutt now