You are reading content from Scuttlebutt
@cel-desktop %pk6X2AXAYM2YlihYdEhcIwOC687PKar68VSxIU12EXs=.sha256

@Daan

re %lXOt/2T...

Patchwork doesn't render this correctly. Shouldn't the caption be either separate or in the [] part?

That text probably should have been put in the image description/text rather than in the title. But I wish the title attribute would be supported. It was supported before the switch to ssb-markdown, hence why it still works in patchfoo and ssb-viewer.

Reference in Original Markdown:
https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#img

In CommonMark:
https://spec.commonmark.org/0.29/#images

In ssb-marked:
http://localhost:7718/%25jkyx88iEK9Xhooc%2Bkg0dRAhiKWwglf9CkOvOl4VBLic%3D.sha256/blob/cc7f9bc66daf22e9bca74d3e9c31f85b629f9ea8/lib/marked.js#L999

@Daan Patchwork %a1TlIFgSQBCL8iiJM7bamWJ6em0HOslHyF4wKveX3s8=.sha256

Wow, TIL about the title spec for markdown. 😆
Indeed, would be good to support that then. It would be an effective relaxation of the status-quo, so should be inherently backwards-compatible.

Join Scuttlebutt now