@emile

SSB client markdown test messages

I don't know if any client supports all of the features used in all of these, but here they are:

• %FtJ79QW... @Martin - markdown test message
• %sHFN/qw... @MrFinch - list of possible markdown. Patchwork Classic era.
  • %PjT6UGO... %xwah0DL... @nanomonkey - test messages
  • %AVGHL9o... @cel - markdown features
• %6rw/RoD... @Sufficiently Large N - test message, including tables
• %ZSwAdzg... @Maleficient [%T0MG1S/... @Kunstlergal] The Markdown Cheatsheet, i.e. Does-this-feature-work.
• %y/ggGe2... @Erm - Testing markdown

Wow, TIL about the title spec for markdown. 😆
Indeed, would be good to support that then. It would be an effective relaxation of the status-quo, so should be inherently backwards-compatible.

@Daan

re %lXOt/2T...

Patchwork doesn't render this correctly. Shouldn't the caption be either separate or in the [] part?

That text probably should have been put in the image description/text rather than in the title. But I wish the title attribute would be supported. It was supported before the switch to ssb-markdown, hence why it still works in patchfoo and ssb-viewer.

Reference in Original Markdown:
https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#img

In CommonMark:
https://spec.commonmark.org/0.29/#images

In ssb-marked:
http://localhost:7718/%25jkyx88iEK9Xhooc%2Bkg0dRAhiKWwglf9CkOvOl4VBLic%3D.sha256/blob/cc7f9bc66daf22e9bca74d3e9c31f85b629f9ea8/lib/marked.js#L999