$100 preparing and doing session

That's an easy yes @cel

I drafted a session submission. On git-ssb (push to master or a branch is okay): %gtKiSW6.... I would appreciate any feedback or improvements from peers, particularly in the next 24 hours. Are there existing presentation slides I could look at or use for this? @dinosaur is there a link to the lightning talk presentation you did of Scuttlebutt clients at Decentralized Web Summit in 2018?

I would like this session to be a general introduction to SSB, with a small technical part introducing how it works. I want to show the different clients. We will have to answer common questions like about moderation and multi-device. I would like to leave plenty of room for additional questions (maybe with some bonus material if there are not many questions). I would like this to help build rapport between the SSB community and the Free Software community, and justify SSB from a software freedom perspective.

cc @mixmix @joey @lxoliva @dominic @andrestaltz

is there a link to the lightning talk presentation you did of Scuttlebutt clients at Decentralized Web Summit in 2018?

@cel

• source : https://github.com/ahdinosaur/dweb-2018
• slides : https://dinosaur.is/dweb-2018/
• video: https://vimeo.com/ahdinosaur/dweb-2018

@cel,

thanks for working on the session

typo: may be head+ed+

I liked very much that you mentioned covering values and emergent culture.

I hope you get a chance to cover the inclusiveness, tolerance and diversity I've loved to experience myself within the SSB community, besides moderation.

I also find the way the community has organized for funding its own maintenance and development worthy of mention.

These are two topics that I often highlight when I mention SSB, and I threaten ;-) to bring them up myself in questions if you don't include them in the talk.

I advise mentioning them in the abstract. Diversity and funding are very relevant to Free the Future ;-)

Thanks again!

Was Patchbay really supposed to be duplicated before (with chess)?

git-ssb needs to be more well-known IMHO; I recommend at least adding (P2P git repository hosting and pull request management) after the mention in the abstract, and somehow mentioning it in the summary, maybe next to collaboration.