immutable butt copy of the notes:
Blockstack application hangout
Here is the gathering %P3h+wEt...
Here is the intial thread: %b5ZRRnG...
Attending:
- andrestaltz
- cblgh
- cel
- dan hassan
- dinosaur
- dominic
- jacob karlsson
- noffle
- zelf
Intros
Quick swing round introducing eachother
Agenda
Mikey is facilitating in Piet's absence
zelf: specific questions about application
To Discuss/Add:
We need at least two more people, who?
The CV / “highlights” from these
Do we have any questions for them?
(this can be good as we stick out more… so yeah, any questions? ;) )
Do we want to add more projects?
Who would you like as representative for the application?
General Questions:
How many members are there on ScuttleButt?
Is there a charted/logged growth curve?
How long has ScuttleButt existed?
Is there an “Official Orginization” behind Scuttlebutt?
Is there an e-mail for Scuttlebutt in general?
Link from zelf to application: https://hackmd.io/s/B1LnbvE0z
andre: mix is missing and is normally quite involved should we get him in?
dominic: what excites me about this is that many people self-organized this call. this application isn't the only one on the horizon, we don't need to figure out a team for every application, we just need a team for the BlockStack application.
andre: we need to consider implications of being the representative
zelf: jolyons suggestions for people to add: @Matt McKegg, @mikey, @ev and @cel
cel: 10 teams for 100k USD per team
andre: if we got 1 million
dan: is there a requirement to forecast what the money will be spent on?
zelf: no, but i haven't focused on that.
mikey: how much do we need to focus on BlockStack?
dominic: i think we should have part of it be integration: have BlockStack name on Scuttlebutt. will make our proposal a shoe-in, but need to stress that we aren't spending the money solely on our BlockStack integration.
cel: i think there are multiple possible integrations, discovery etc. also since they are funding 10 teams, they could allow for diversity.
dan: does anyone have a contact within BlockStack?
dominic: i did a security audit for BlockStack, so have interacted with several of their core developers.
dan: suggest someone pairs with dominic to get connected to ask questions. in my experience of funding grants, it's good to get connected to cater to what they are looking for.
andre: ...
cel: we could reserve one of the grant rounds specifically for BlockStack
zelf: that would be the best. another thing is their developing this funding structure, it's a larger scale of what we're doing, if we split it up again it might not feed back into their network as they want.
ACTION: dominic to connect zelf and co with BlockStack contacts
dominic: running the grants turned out to be a burden, recommend some allocated to grants, some allocated to quests (like mobile quests), also pay people who do work to herd all the cats.
andre: grants have funded lots of experimental things, whearas quests have helped more with clear fixes and features.
zelf: could have a call to specific things done.
dominic: that's the quests we recently started.
andre: quests == we have funding to fix specific holes || grants == we have funding for whatever
andre: funding comes from different sources, we have different buckets of funding, each controlled by different people.
zelf: do we want to re-use structure? we don't need to answer that. we do need to know what they want, so we can cater to them. if they're looking for specific integrations with their platform, then we need to cater to that.
dominic: should we come to them with "hey this is what we're thinking, what do you think?"
dan: in my experience, sometimes a display of effort shows that we've put time into it, a solid signal to the funder that it's worth putting resources into funding.
zelf: i think we can go in saying "this is who we are", "here's how we can be useful", "what can we achieve?"
dan: happy to take zelfs view! :)
andre: "do you think if we build this it makes sense?"
andre: what's going to be the legal entity for this? think elavoile's french organization is a clear candidate.
zelf: one thing we could do is spend some money to talk to a lawyer.
dan: we could also partner with an established organisation to act as umbrella for receiving the funds. or alternatively can we do it like DFINITY? creating an organisation is overhead - if we're doing this anyway, then cool :)
zelf: who would like to be resonsible for this application?
mikey: many of us are part of workers' coop-y companies, mayb one of us should raise our hand to say "high-trust hand-wave we'll receive the funds"
dan: if we got the money, how would we use it?
dominic: we're amidst many discussions about how to fund maintenance. the result of that could be how we handle this one.
dan: does anyone want to act as the "indexer" of previous conversation on how we manage grants / quests / etc?
dan: does anyone want to take the lead on creating a historical record for how we got 200k USD and didn't blow up.
andre: cel, i notice you had the most ideas for how to integrate with BlockStack, plus you want to setup a US org, do you wanna take the lead on this?
cel: i can work on putting together the things.
zelf: we should see if we need to have an organization at this time. if we don't, at least we have time to talk to lawyers, structure etc.
andre: what if we had two applications?
zelf: "how will we integrate with BlockStack"
zelf: "if we were to build a decentralized structure, we'd do this"
cblgh: would a half-way retrospective of the ssbc grants so-far be useful in helping to decide how to use the money (if received)? (feels like it might be a big energy vampire though)
dan: i can pair with you on that!
zelf: we should figure out who will be the representative:
- volunteer 1: mikey
- volunteer 2: 2nd-tier Dan
- volunteer 3: andre
- volunteer 4: zenna
zelf: quick status:
- who is responsible?
- some small questions we haven't gotten through
- right now, we can't send in application as is because we should look into what angle we want to take on the application
- if we want to make it more integrated, more seprate, etc
- should add two more people on teams' background
- dominic and i will talk to BlockStack
- andre and cel will look into how to make an integration with BlockStack
andre: makes sense the people involved, listed are andre, cel, zelf, and dominic. cel has made impressive things, git-ssb, ssb-npm, etc.
zelf: cel, can you write info about yourself?
dan: we didn't speak about the deadline - would be useful to know timelines of when this needs rallying by. ciao for real this time :p
check-outs
lingering thoughts
thanks! =^.^=